if you feel like banging your head against the wall…

you can spend the next 30 minutes with this episode of al jazeera’s inside story. normally maryam nemazee is okay when interviewing her subjects, but given her background in investigating particular topics i find it strange that she ignored things like the israeli terrorist state’s possession of nuclear weapons. her guests are dan schueftan, an israeli terrorist professor from haifa university who makes me ill and who should be banned from al jazeera i feel; amer hamzawi; and robert fisk, who did a horrible job responding to nemazee’s questions–especially in the 2nd half when he had a golden opportunity to challenge the mofo on nuclear weapons. here is a sample of that nutcase israeli terrorist said:

you’re misrepresenting the issues here because when we’re speaking about the arab peace initiative, israel responded to it saying it had very positive elements in it and israel is willing to negotiate it. the problem is what the arab states are saying is that israel will have to accept refugees according to 194 and then they want to sign on the dotted line before negotiations even start. the real issues in the middle east have very little to do with the palestinians. palestinians are a negligible issue. everyone deals wtih it. the real problem is the nuclearization of iran. everybody in the region is concerned about it. for egypt it’s a major threat. the whole region may become nuclear after the iranians become nuclear.

point one: yes, this is true. the israeli terrorists should be forced to sign any agreement BEFORE negotiations start, though the arab initiative is flawed. not only that but they should show us they actually will make good on their signature. unfortunately, racist white south africans keep their word better than zionist colonists. we know from every single second of the last 122 years that zionists/israelis never tell the truth and their words can never be honored.

fisk responds to this nimrod by saying that the real issue is pakistan with regards to the nuclear threat. which leads me to point two: fisk completely ignores the nuclear issue. the real threat is not pakistan it is the israeli terrorist state. period. many of us have known this for a long time because we read credible sources. others (read: the u.s.) find this information to be somehow new:

But JOE 2008 also departed from the norm in U.S. Government documents by identifying Israel as a nuclear weapons state.

“In effect, there is a growing arc of nuclear powers running from Israel in the west through an emerging Iran to Pakistan, India, and on to China, North Korea, and Russia in the east,” JOE 2008 stated (pdf, at page 37) in a discussion of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

The unusual reference to Israel’s nuclear status was noticed by Amir Oren in Ha’aretz, who explained that “Israel’s nuclear program is rarely, if ever, explicitly mentioned in public, unclassified U.S. official documents.” See “U.S. Army document describes Israel as ‘a nuclear power’,” Ha’aretz, March 8.

and on a related note, point 2.5, the real danger with respect to pakistan is not nuclear weapons (though they should be banned everywhere to be sure), but rather the united states of terrorism. david sanger and eric schmitt report in the new york times that it seems likely the u.s. war in pakistan will not only continue, but expand:

But some American officials say the missile strikes in the tribal areas have forced some leaders of the Taliban and Al Qaeda to flee south toward Quetta, making them more vulnerable. In separate reports, groups led by both Gen. David H. Petraeus, commander of American forces in the region, and Lt. Gen. Douglas E. Lute, a top White House official on Afghanistan, have recommended expanding American operations outside the tribal areas if Pakistan cannot root out the strengthening insurgency.

Many of Mr. Obama’s advisers are also urging him to sustain orders issued last summer by President George W. Bush to continue Predator drone attacks against a wider range of targets in the tribal areas. They also are recommending preserving the option to conduct cross-border ground actions, using C.I.A. and Special Operations commandos, as was done in September. Mr. Bush’s orders also named as targets a wide variety of insurgents seeking to topple Pakistan’s government. Mr. Obama has said little in public about how broadly he wants to pursue those groups.

A spokesman for the National Security Council, Mike Hammer, declined to provide details, saying, “We’re still working hard to finalize the review on Afghanistan and Pakistan that the president requested.”

No other officials would talk on the record about the issue, citing the administration’s continuing internal deliberations and the politically volatile nature of strikes into Pakistani territory.

“It is fair to say that there is wide agreement to sustain and continue these covert programs,” said one senior administration official. “One of the foundations on which the recommendations to the president will be based is that we’ve got to sustain the disruption of the safe havens.”

the point of the show was actually avigdor lieberman who is slated to become the zionist entity’s next foreign minister. here is what one palestinian in 1948 asks us to do about this:

Ahmed Tibi, an MP with the United Arab List, urged the European Union to boycott Lieberman if he becomes foreign minister. “I urge European foreign ministers not to recognize this fascist who advocates the expulsion of Arabs,” he said.

here is what fisk has to say about lieberman in the independent yesterday:

Only days after they were groaning with fury at the Israeli lobby’s success in hounding the outspoken Charles Freeman away from his proposed intelligence job for President Obama, the Arabs now have to contend with an Israeli Foreign Minister whose – let us speak frankly – racist comments about Palestinian loyalty tests have brought into the new Netanyahu cabinet one of the most unpleasant politicians in the Middle East.

The Iraqis produced the hateful Saddam, the Iranians created the crackpot Ahmadinejad – for reasons of sanity, I leave out the weird ruler of Libya – and now the Israelis have exalted a man, Avigdor Lieberman, who out-Sharons even Ariel Sharon.

A few Palestinians expressed their cruel delight that at last the West will see the “true face” of Israel. I’ve heard that one before – when Sharon became prime minister – and the usual nonsense will be trotted out that only a “hard-line extremist” can make the compromises necessary for a deal with the Palestinians.

This kind of self-delusion is a Middle East disease. The fact is that the Israeli Prime Minister-to-be has made it perfectly clear there will be no two-state solution; and he has planted a tree on Golan to show the Syrians they will not get it back. And now he’s brought into the cabinet a man who sees even the Arabs of Israel as second-class citizens.

i agree with angry arab on this one, not fisk:

Lieberman=Peres=Livni=Rabin=Ben Gurion=Begin=Sharon=the rest of the Zionist gang

but what really pissed me off is what fisk says in the episode about palestinians giving up on un resolution 194. nope, sorry to inform you, robert, but they have not given up this right. nor is it for you to say what rights they do and do not give up. i thank god that they have never given up this right and i hope that they never do. indeed, while i agree with as’ad on the fact that every leader of the israeli terrorist state has been an extremist terrorist, the difference with lieberman is he is more vocal about it. but what i hope this does is energize a new base, a new liberation movement that ends the zionist entity once and for all. lieberman in office, if he outrages people enough, i hope would once again lead this region to stand up not only to the colonial regime here, but the neo-colonial regimes in the rest of the region.

as long as whatever israeli terrorist that is in power of colonized palestine helps to embolden the boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement, i’m all for it. apparently the zionist terrorists are looking so bad right now that they are “rebranding” themselves because of the ever expanding boycott movement as the zionist shmuck ethan bronner reports in the new york times:

Israel, whose founding idea was branded as racism by the United Nations General Assembly in 1975 and which faced an Arab boycott for decades, is no stranger to isolation. But in the weeks since its Gaza war, and as it prepares to inaugurate a hawkish right-wing government, it is facing its worst diplomatic crisis in two decades.

Examples abound. Its sports teams have met hostility and violent protests in Sweden, Spain and Turkey. Mauritania has closed Israel’s embassy.

Relations with Turkey, an important Muslim ally, have suffered severely. A group of top international judges and human rights investigators recently called for an inquiry into Israel’s actions in Gaza. “Israel Apartheid Week” drew participants in 54 cities around the world this month, twice the number of last year, according to its organizers. And even in the American Jewish community, albeit in its liberal wing, there is a chill.

and let’s actively work to make this process continue. we must mobilize…it’s the only solution if you want to stop banging your head against the wall. the zionist entity is clearly worried and spending millions of dollars because of that. so while we work on bds, insha’allah we can bankrupt them too.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s