the west bank does not = palestine (just a very small, diminishing part of it)

archipelago of eastern palestine by julien bousac
archipelago of eastern palestine by julien bousac

as soon as i turned on my computer after school today i saw this tweet from @avinunu:

Ding dong the 2- state solution is dead! Rub your eyes get out of bed! Ding dong the wicked 2-state solution is dead! #Israel #Netanyahu

no, it is not an april fool’s joke. but this is the thinking among many palestinians about the new terrorist, fascist colonist regime that was sworn in today. khaled amayreh sums up this sentiment in palestine think tank pretty well:

In short, we are talking about a man who lies as often as he breathes a dishonest politician who thinks and smart public relations can be a more effective substitution for an honest peace process based on human rights and international law.

This is why, the capitals of the world must not allow themselves to be duped, deceived and cheated by this notorious, cardinal liar.

I am, of course, in no way suggesting that the previous Israeli government was less nefarious than the new one. The previous government of the evil trio Olmert, Livni and Barak had all the hallmarks of a Zionist Third Reich.

What else can be said of a government that ordered its army to exterminate and incinerate thousands of civilians with White Phosphorus, and then shamelessly claimed that it didn’t really mean to do it?

However, that government was considered by many states around the world, such as the gullible Europeans, a “government of peace,” a “liberal,” even “leftist government,” which really gave a new meaning to the term “verbal fornication.”

For us Palestinians, and despite the legitimate and understandable anxiety stemming from the rise of fascism in Israel, it is still better to have in Israel a manifestly fascist government pursuing fascist policies than a deceptively “liberal” or “leftist” government pursuing the same criminal policies.

Let the world see Israel as it really is.

In the final analysis, an honest criminal is better than a lying saint. At least the former is predictable and consistent.

in contradistinction former palestinian president mahmoud abbas had this to say about the netanyahu in ma’an news:

Israel’s new Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “does not believe in peace” Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas said Wednesday, and urged the world to put pressure on him to make peace.

“Benjamin Netanyahu never believed in a two-state solution or accepted signed agreements and does not want to stop settlement activity. This is obvious,” Abbas told the official Palestinian Authority news agency, WAFA.

while most of us who want to celebrate the death of a two-state solution with this new regime we are facing, there are, unfortunately, the palestinian authority wish to continue to promote an ever-shrinking palestinian state. i suspect if they keep at it they will wind up with ramallah as their state. perhaps jordan, which is what the israeli colonists have wanted all along. the map up above demonstrates just how little of the west bank would be a state in this so-called “solution.” (see mondoweiss and strange maps for more about its creation). but abbas’ words quoted above are reminiscent of hillary clinton’s comments that building illegal colonies are “unhelpful.” here are more of what i think are abba’s unhelpful comments:

Netanyahu made no specific mention, however, of Palestinian statehood, an important Palestinian demand that is supported by the US and other parties involved in mediating between the two sides.

“Under the final accord, the Palestinians will have all the rights to govern themselves except those that can put in danger the security and existence of the state of Israel,” he said.

Netanyahu also said that he wanted “full peace” with all Arab countries, praising Islam as a rich religion, but he attacked Iran and “radical Islam” as threats to Israel’s security.

“Extremist Islam does not only threaten us, but it threatens us first and foremost … Its goal is to erase the state of Israel from the face of the earth,” he said.

The Palestinian Authority described Netanyahu’s remarks as “not encouraging”.

of course the real island here is the pa itself. their thinking that peace is something you beg for is not shared by many palestinians, including many people in fatah. max ajl wrote in the palestine chronicle that some americans are still attempting to force palestinians into submitting that their state consists of this archipelago pictured above:

And it presents the brief for acting with dispatch: “Failure to act would prove extremely costly. It would not only undermine current efforts to weaken extremist groups, bolster our moderate allies and rally regional support to stabilize Iraq and contain Iran, but would also risk permanent loss of the two-state solution as settlements expand and become entrenched and extremists on both sides consolidate their hold.” The report’s authors recognize that if the two state settlement is not emplaced now, it will be emplaced never.

the plan ajl talks about is, like all american-sponsored plans, a frightening proposition as it allows the continued theft of palestinian water. but i suspect we needn’t worry about any of this given avigdor lieberman’s, the new foreign minister, statement today:

New foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman said on Wednesday that Israel was not bound by commitments it made at a U.S.-sponsored conference to pursue creation of a Palestinian state.

“There is one document that obligates us – and that’s not the Annapolis conference, it has no validity,” Lieberman said in a speech, referring to a 2007 gathering in Annapolis, Maryland.

“The Israeli government never ratified Annapolis, nor did Knesset.”

and yet nour odeh reporting for al jazeera from ramallah seems woefully out of touch of what the people think about this new government. she stands there speaking from the island of ramallah thinking that palestinians are waiting for the europeans or the americans to fix the problem of the two state solutions. somebody really needs to tell her that the problem is that palestinians want to liberate their land and that they don’t want to think of this series of islands in the west bank as their state. she needs to spend a couple of weeks in nahr el bared refugee camp in lebanon to get a dose of reality in relation to what palestinians want:

still the note it ends on–that this is likely the end of the two-state catastrophe–is a good one. a hopeful sign. sam bahour published a new poster on his blog today to protest the new government and to support the boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement (see below) calling for:

Hang this poster/flyer on your library bulletin board, supermarket bulletin board, city hall bulletin board, university bulletin board, place on car windshields at events, take out newspaper ads, hold press conferences, add to your websites, send to your newspapers editorial staff, etc, etc.

sam bahour flyer on bds
sam bahour flyer on bds

for those who prefer to wait for obama to rescue them and give them their bantustan state, while israeli terrorists continue to colonize more land, we can glean what obama is really about from this brief comment seymour hersh made on cnn with wolf blitzer about his encouragement of the israeli terrorists who besieged gaza:

and for those of you who think that boycott doesn’t work: check this out from the jerusalem post:

“In addition to the problems and difficulties arising from the global economic crisis, 21 percent of local exporters report that they are facing problems in selling Israeli goods because of an anti-Israel boycott, mainly from the UK and Scandinavian countries,” said Yair Rotloi, chairman of the association’s foreign-trade committee.

oh, and here, by the way, is a real map of palestine. the palestine that must be liberated from the river to the sea.

THIS IS PALESTINE
THIS IS PALESTINE

3 thoughts on “the west bank does not = palestine (just a very small, diminishing part of it)

  1. This is a libelous misrepresentation of what I wrote. You observe that “max ajl wrote in the palestine chronicle that some americans are still attempting to force palestinians into submitting that their state consists of this archipelago pictured above:…the plan ajl talks about is, like all american-sponsored plans, a frightening proposition as it allows the continued theft of palestinian water”

    The Siegman plan is NOT perfect. It’s extremely far from perfect. But the document discusses putting any proposed plan to a democratic referendum, and calls for contiguity. How are the Americans “forcing” anybody to do anything?

    You write as though I didn’t explicitly highlight the worrisome aspects of the plan vis-a-vis Palestinian water resources…
    http://www.maxajl.com/?p=705

    Look, you’re there and I’m here. But this is not Oslo-style thievery. If Obama puts pressure on for a two-state “solution,” and it ends up looking like the map you have pictured above, why would any Palestinian vote for it?

    1. to say that the writing i did about your article is libelous, i think, is quite a stretch. i quoted one paragraph of your article in order to highlight that americans are still trying attempting to collude with the israeli terrorist regime to push palestinians to submit to a plan that would make force them to give up their rights to their land. palestinians, meaning the general public who live under colonization in all of historic palestine, do not want these so-called “solutions.” they want their land back. period. they do not have a vote or a say in this process at all. their american-israeli controlled government colludes in the process of disenfranchisement. so, yes, it is forced upon them. the map above is not a prediction of the future: it is the reality TODAY. and the issue of the water is not helpful either. the water is ALL palestinian. period. right now in deheishe refugee camp friends of mine have no water and yet there is an aquifer at the top of their camp. why? because the zionist entity siphons it off for its colonies in the west bank.

      my comments were not about you or your writing. it was about the idea that yet again americans are attempting to intervene with some plan to make palestinians submit to their goal of liberating their land. the plan you write about seems to me like more of the same neocolonial designs on palestine.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s